Received: from flame.flame.co.za (flame.flame.co.za [160.124.170.1]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA08448 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 1999 03:23:01 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from theo@flame.co.za) Received: from flame.co.za (flame [160.124.170.1]) by flame.flame.co.za (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA09181 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 1999 09:28:40 +0200 Sender: theo@flame.flame.co.za Message-ID: <37E5E228.F3E1321D@flame.co.za> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 09:28:40 +0200 From: Theo Kramer Organization: Flame Computing Enterprises X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.35 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org" Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2 References: <20970.937688441@sss.pgh.pa.us> <99091817232103.00581@lowen.wgcr.org> <37E479DA.6FDFA5F4@alumni.caltech.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thomas Lockhart wrote: > Underscores in program names suck. To paraphrase Ali, "no opinion, > just fact" ;) > > If we are going to rename programs wholesale, let's do it for release > 7.0, and if we must have "pg" in front of everything, then do it as, > e.g. "pgcreateuser". We could rename "pg_dump" as "pgdump" at the same > time. I agree regarding the underscore. I do think that changing the names sooner would create less hassle in the long run. Especially now when more and more folk are starting to use postgres. > btw, is it only me or do other people refer to this as "pig dump"? grunt :-) -------- Regards Theo