From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: pawel.szymczyk90@gmail.com
cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Missing word
In-reply-to: 
 <174713246453.1455387.17456549337034802242@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
References: 
 <174713246453.1455387.17456549337034802242@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
Comments: In-reply-to PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
	message dated "Tue, 13 May 2025 10:34:24 -0000"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <3898.1747145998.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 10:19:58 -0400
Message-ID: <3899.1747145998@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3899.1747145998%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> In the paragraph:
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/ddl-partitioning.html#DDL-PARTIT=
IONING-DECLARATIVE-MAINTENANCE,
> sentence "Another option that is often preferable is to remove the parti=
tion
> from the partitioned table but retain access to it as a table in its own
> right." there is missing "not" word. Correct form of this sentence shoul=
d
> be: Another option that is often preferable is to not remove the partiti=
on
> from the partitioned table but retain access to it as a table in its own
> right.

AFAICS, it's correct as written.

			regards, tom lane