Received: from localhost (IDENT:root@hectic-1.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.68.203]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA00513 for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 10:59:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu) Received: from alumni.caltech.edu (lockhart@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA24287; Tue, 16 May 2000 15:03:28 GMT Message-ID: <39216340.2AD94EF7@alumni.caltech.edu> Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 15:03:28 +0000 From: Thomas Lockhart X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vince Vielhaber CC: docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: 6.5 and 7.0 docs References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive-Number: 200005/12 > While we're at it, can we regen 6.5 and 7.0's docs for the user's lounge? > I thought I checked them into cvs last week, apparantly I didn't. :( That's OK. You may want to consider *not* checking them in at all, since they are, in principle, recoverable from the distro tarballs. I couldn't recall the exact layout, but have placed v6.5 and v7.0 docs tarballs, ps, and html files in users-lounge/docs/{v6.5,v7.0}, respectively. Perhaps I could write a script which you could put into cvs to help unpack the distro tarballs and extract the relevant docs files. Looks like a doxlist.html is missing from the lounge area? And as a style point, could/should the directory be labeled "doc" rather than "docs" to be consistant with the tarball labeling? I recall "docs" being used before, so went with that for now. I have not yet replaced the developer's stuff, and would propose doing that with the autogenerated files sometime soon. - Thomas -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California