Received: from faroenet.fo ([212.55.59.140]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA42700 for ; Wed, 24 May 2000 12:31:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from plc@faroenet.fo) Received: (qmail 19699 invoked by uid 7719); 24 May 2000 17:35:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO faroenet.fo) (192.168.1.21) by 192.168.1.1 with SMTP; 24 May 2000 17:35:26 -0000 Message-ID: <392BF670.B1B4067@faroenet.fo> Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 17:34:08 +0200 From: "Poul L. Christiansen" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.71 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benjamin Adida CC: Vince Vielhaber , Bruce Momjian , PostgreSQL-development , PostgreSQL-documentation Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: interactive pgsql book References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive-Number: 200005/27 Benjamin Adida wrote: > on 5/24/00 12:02 PM, Vince Vielhaber at vev@michvhf.com wrote: > > > On Wed, 24 May 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > >> That is quite interesting. Let me CC this over to the hackers/docs > >> lists to see if we want to do this for our main docs. > >> > >> As for my book, I want those messages sent to me so I can fix them or > >> add information to the book. I think maybe we want the same thing for > >> the manuals. We want to get suggestions so we can compile them into the > >> manuals and add to them, rather than having comments, but I am > >> interested to hear what others say. > > > > By "interactive" I ass/u/me Poul is referring to PHP's annotated manual. > > I've found that to save me HOURS due to oddball little quirks that someone > > else discovered first and noted in the annotated docs. > > > > I'd not only support this, if it's wanted I'll make sure it's implemented. > > I'm not trying to start any kind of war, but since OpenACS is being > considered for community management already, it can automatically set up > HTML file annotation with no extra effort. All you do is add the HTML files > to the doc directory and sync up with the database (one click), and you've > got user-contributed annotations (with moderation if you so desire). > > This is similar to Philip Greenspun's photo.net docs. > > -Ben If OpenACS has the features that I've mentioned, then I see no need to re-invent the wheel. When will we be able to use OpenACS? - Poul L. Christiansen