Received: from golem.jpl.nasa.gov (IDENT:postfix@hectic-1.jpl.nasa.gov
	[128.149.68.203]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA22040
	for <docs@postgresql.org>; Tue, 30 May 2000 22:18:39 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu)
Received: from alumni.caltech.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by golem.jpl.nasa.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0E09F6EF1; Wed, 31 May 2000 02:18:09 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <39347661.1578E0B2@alumni.caltech.edu>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 02:18:09 +0000
From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
Organization: Yes
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14-15mdksmp i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Docs after split
References: <200005270330.XAA15231@candle.pha.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archive-Number: 200005/33

> Thomas, now that there is a 7.0 split, do you want to keep both cvs
> trees up-to-date, or just keep current up-to-date?

current should be supported for sure. Haven't bothered with the stable
tree, since it could lead to a large increase in work.

istm that we *could* update the stable branch at the last minute by
diffing two trees.

                      - Thomas