Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kdg96-0004By-Df for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 20:58:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kdg95-0002gc-Aq for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 20:58:11 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kdg95-0002gU-35 for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 20:58:11 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kdg92-0000NJ-Qp for pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 20:58:10 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0ADKw4XZ398614; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 15:58:04 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Edson Richter cc: "David G. Johnston" , pgsql-general Subject: Re: Range partitioning and overlap In-reply-to: References: , Comments: In-reply-to Edson Richter message dated "Fri, 13 Nov 2020 20:46:43 +0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <398612.1605301084.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 15:58:04 -0500 Message-ID: <398613.1605301084@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Edson Richter writes: > Further on the documentation: "When creating a range partition, the lowe= r bound specified with FROM is an inclusive bound, whereas the upper bound= specified with TO is an exclusive bound." > I'm pretty sure I cannot find this statement in PostgreSQL 13 documentat= ion page about partitioning. May be this statement is in another page? It's in the CREATE TABLE reference page. Seems like it would be a good idea to have it also in ddl.sgml's discussion of partitioning, though. regards, tom lane