Received: from golem.fourpalms.org (fourpalms.org [64.3.68.148])
	by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f027C2L48638;
	Tue, 2 Jan 2001 02:12:06 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu)
Received: from alumni.caltech.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by golem.fourpalms.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D5EFEFEAA; Tue,  2 Jan 2001 07:11:52 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <3A517F38.8CE020E0@alumni.caltech.edu>
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 07:11:52 +0000
From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
Organization: Yes
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17-21mdksmp i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Paul Govereau <pgoverea@akamai.com>,
	pgsql-docs@postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Inheritance docs error.
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0012302007350.776-100000@peter.localdomain>
	<3794.978206926@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archive-Number: 200101/4
X-Sequence-Number: 138

> I am strongly inclined to rip out the pseudo-UNDER clause and support
> only the old-style INHERITS syntax for 7.1.  UNDER is adding no
> functionality and I think we will eventually regret using an SQL keyword
> for non-SQL semantics.

I agree with you, Hannu, et al. If it isn't making a good effort in
truely supporting SQL9x, then it isn't yet worth having in the parser.

                    - Thomas