Message-ID: <3A8E8B06.13F0840C@svana.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 01:30:30 +1100
From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
CC: Richard <poboxcanada@yahoo.com>, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Annotatable on-line documentation
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0102162134140.1009-100000@peter.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> 
> Richard writes:
> 
> > Would this lighten the work load on the folk that are
> > currently maintaining the docs?  Would it lighten the
> > work load for the core developers?  Would it stimulate
> > the development of richer documetation?  Would it draw
> > some of the load off the mailing lists?
> 
> My concerns are mostly that that kind of thing would be abused as a
> discussion forum, the quality of the comments is quite low on average, and
> the added efforts to weed out the posts on a regular basis seem
> prohibite.
> 
> I don't see any particular advantage coming from this that couldn't be
> achieved in another way.

Well, one thing would be is that it would make it easier for other
people to submit changes to a particular page on the docs. You can just
go there and submit a change. Sending a patch much harder.

Maybe, as someone else suggested, a moderated one. That would stop the
discussion problem.
-- 
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@cupid.suninternet.com>
http://cupid.suninternet.com/~kleptog/