Received: from golem.fourpalms.org (www.fourpalms.org [64.3.68.148])
	by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1NG0Wx55316;
	Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:00:32 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu)
Received: from alumni.caltech.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by golem.fourpalms.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8F0F7FEB4; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 16:00:26 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <3A96891A.951CDCC8@alumni.caltech.edu>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 16:00:26 +0000
From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
Reply-To: lockhart@fourpalms.org
Organization: Yes
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17-21mdksmp i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org, pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Java class documentation
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0102222159580.1923-100000@peter.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archive-Number: 200102/125
X-Sequence-Number: 383

> Could we for now remove the formal class documentation from the DocBook
> source, while keeping the narrative parts, and instead point people to the
> JavaDoc?  Could we make prebuild class documentation in HTML available to
> users, maybe where the jars are downloaded?

Works for me. Not sure if we have rules for building javadoc in our
makefiles, but I'm sure it would be easy to add if necessary. Peter M,
what do you think?

                     - Thomas