Received: from server.911ep.com (gw2.911ep.com [204.221.243.218]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f26J9ix59082 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 14:09:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from John.Burski@911ep.com) Received: from 911ep.com (IDENT:johnb@ophelia.911ep.com [192.168.9.40]) by server.911ep.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA01070 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 13:10:56 -0600 Message-ID: <3AA535F6.4010700@911ep.com> Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 13:09:42 -0600 From: John Burski Organization: 911 Emergency Products User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i686; en-US; m18) Gecko/20010131 Netscape6/6.01 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PostgreSQL-general Subject: Re: SQL article References: <01C0A63A.D599BBF0.mascarm@mascari.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive-Number: 200103/276 X-Sequence-Number: 5759 If you read through to the bottom of the second page of the article and follow the "continue" link, you'll find that he does mention PostgreSQL and compares (rather favorably, IMHO) it to Access, MySQL, and Oracle. He even indicates that he is going to be focusing on PostgreSQL in a future article. Mike Mascari wrote: > Kind of annoying that under "Related:" there aren't any PostgreSQL links though. > > Mike Mascari > mascarm@mascari.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Momjian [SMTP:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us] > Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 12:36 PM > To: PostgreSQL-documentation > Cc: PostgreSQL-general > Subject: [GENERAL] SQL article > > This was an interesting introduction to SQL: > > http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/linux/2000/10/20/aboutSQL_1.html > -- John Burski Chief I.T. Cook and Bottlewasher 911 Emergency Products, St. Cloud, MN (320) 656 0076 www.911ep.com ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + How's your cheese holding out? + ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++