Received: from mta01.mail.mel.aone.net.au (mta01.mail.au.uu.net
 [203.2.192.81])
	by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f38FBR832214
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Sun, 8 Apr 2001 11:11:28 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from jclift@iprimus.com.au)
Received: from iprimus.com.au ([63.34.218.161])
	by mta01.mail.mel.aone.net.au with ESMTP
	id <20010408151122.MWXU6958.mta01.mail.mel.aone.net.au@iprimus.com.au>;
	Mon, 9 Apr 2001 01:11:22 +1000
Message-ID: <3AD07E7F.551A3AD1@iprimus.com.au>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 01:06:39 +1000
From: Justin Clift <jclift@iprimus.com.au>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
CC: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Info for Solaris-FAQ and prob Unixware-FAQ
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0104081349000.1236-100000@peter.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archive-Number: 200104/25
X-Sequence-Number: 597

Hi Peter,

I've been testing the compilation process of 7.1RC3 with the newest
release of OpenSSL (0.9.6a) today.  The des_encrypt() namespace conflict
is no longer present on Solaris 8 (SPARC nor INTEL).  So it looks like
the OpenSSL guys have renamed the conflicting functions.

Is this something worth mentioning in the Solaris-FAQ (and probably the
Unixware-FAQ)?

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift