Received: from news.tht.net (news.hub.org [216.126.91.242]) by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f3A3t4877623 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 23:55:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from news@news.tht.net) Received: (from news@localhost) by news.tht.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f3A3hAD19300 for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 23:43:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from news) From: Mark Butler X-Newsgroups: comp.databases.postgresql.docs Subject: Function Inheritance? Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 21:43:14 -0600 Organization: Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Lines: 14 Message-ID: <3AD28152.5B88F069@middle.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: scrappy@hub.org X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200104/39 X-Sequence-Number: 611 In http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/sql-createtable.html "Postgres automatically allows the created table to inherit functions on tables above it in the inheritance hierarchy." "Postgres automatically allows the created table to inherit functions on tables above it in the inheritance hierarchy. Inheritance of functions is done according to the conventions of the Common Lisp Object System (CLOS)." Neither of these statements is true, right? I do not beleive that PostgreSQL current supports inheritable member functions. Shouldn't both of these statements be removed? - Mark Butler