On Apr 12, 2007, at 7:54 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> Two questions: Why is pg_backend_pid documented with the stats  
> functions (9.19 System Information Functions) seems more logical.
>
> Also, I can see mentioning the stats functions in the monitoring  
> section, but shouldn't they actually be documented in with the rest  
> of the functions?

No comments? Does that mean if I write up a patch it'll be accepted?
--
Jim Nasby                                            jim@nasby.net
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)