Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B0E3475D41; Sat, 31 Aug 2002 22:54:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joeconway.com (unknown [63.210.180.150]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07BEE475D2D; Sat, 31 Aug 2002 22:54:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.5.3] (account jconway HELO joeconway.com) by joeconway.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9) with ESMTP-TLS id 1317916; Sat, 31 Aug 2002 19:39:11 -0700 Message-ID: <3D7180EE.4010106@joeconway.com> Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 19:52:30 -0700 From: Joe Conway User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Lane Cc: PostgreSQL Patches , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [PATCHES] pg_settings doc patch References: <3D715089.1050507@joeconway.com> <14044.1030840580@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200208/34 X-Sequence-Number: 1452 Tom Lane wrote: > pg_settings is not a system catalog, so I don't think it belongs in the > system catalogs chapter. In fact it doesn't belong anywhere in the > Developer's Guide, since it's a user-oriented view. > > I'm not sure where it *does* belong though :-(. Right at the moment we > have no documentation of any of the predefined system views, except for > the ones that fit into the "monitoring" chapter of the Admin Guide. > > I think maybe we ought to make a new chapter for system views ... but > where to put it? User's Guide maybe? > What about putting pg_settings documentation at the bottom of: ->Administrators Guide ->Server run-time environment ->run-time configuration just before the Planner and optimizer tuning subsection? http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/runtime-config.html I think at some point there should be a consolidated section on system views, but since they are scattered at the moment, this seems like the most logical choice to me. Comments? Joe