Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AEB8475E75 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 00:47:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from myst.fourpalms.org (golem.fourpalms.org [64.3.68.148]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A40475D0F for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 00:47:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from fourpalms.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by myst.fourpalms.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FEBE3499532; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 00:47:19 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3DD095E7.1040406@fourpalms.org> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 05:47:19 +0000 From: Thomas Lockhart Organization: Yes User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neil Conway Cc: Bruce Momjian , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: concurrency control docs error References: <200211120445.gAC4jeo29705@candle.pha.pa.us> <87wunjwevg.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200211/19 X-Sequence-Number: 1543 Try something like: Explicit locks can increase the likelyhood of deadlock conditions... - Thomas