Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A19AE47642B for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 10:37:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from myst.fourpalms.org (golem.fourpalms.org [64.3.68.148]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6280D47621E for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 10:33:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from fourpalms.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by myst.fourpalms.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A79834E5F79; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 10:33:19 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3DEB7D3F.1050801@fourpalms.org> Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 15:33:19 +0000 From: Thomas Lockhart Organization: Yes User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Mount Cc: Tom Lane , Vince Vielhaber , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: PDF docs References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200212/5 X-Sequence-Number: 1578 >>>Who generated the PDF docs for 7.2? Remember how it was done? Is >>>there a script somewhere for it? >>Thomas has always done that in the past. There is some basic info >>about it in the docs: >>http://www.ca.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.3/postgres/doc-build.html >>(see B.3.3), but I got the impression that he always did a great deal >>of manual tweaking in the process. The amount of tweaking went way down in the last couple of releases since I identified the misformed but easily fixed rtf (in the opinion of ApplixWare) generated by OpenJade. Look at doc/src/sgml/fixrtf for a little utility to do that. OpenOffice seems to be happy with the rtf, though I can't remember if I applied "fixrtf" first. However, I did not generate documents for 7.2. Folks seemed to have concluded that it was not a useful feature and were not willing to accomodate it in the release process, so I stopped doing that. Peter E. generated documents automatically for 7.2 (using tex rather than rtf->word processor->ps) and it has the deficiencies noted below as one would expect since they are well known issues to the OpenJade community. The "manual tweaking" is a requirement for high-quality docs no matter what path you choose; hopefully someone will realize that and decide to put in some work. > IIRC tables didn't format correctly (occasionally split over pages). > Also (not sure if previous post made it), the docbook->PDF generated badly > implemented files (~30% bigger than need be) [caused by pdftex].