X-Original-To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Received: from spampd.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD609474E44
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Wed,  2 Apr 2003 17:07:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailbox4.ucsd.edu (mailbox4.ucsd.edu [132.239.1.56])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4BD47632B
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Wed,  2 Apr 2003 17:07:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from smtp.ucsd.edu (smtp-a.ucsd.edu [132.239.1.49])
	by mailbox4.ucsd.edu (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h32M7sbo007743
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 14:07:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ucsd.edu (csenger.extern.ucsd.edu [137.110.16.219])
	by smtp.ucsd.edu (8.12.9/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h32M7rM4017391
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 14:07:53 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <3E8B5FAB.6040503@ucsd.edu>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 14:09:47 -0800
From: Charles Senger <csenger@ucsd.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020605
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: sgmltools don't work here
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spamscanner: mailbox4.ucsd.edu  (v1.2 Mar 17 2003 15:04:36, -100.2/5.0 2.43)
X-MailScanner: PASSED (v1.2.7 84997 h32M7sbo007743 mailbox4.ucsd.edu)
X-Spam-Status: No,
 hits=-12.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA
	autolearn=ham	version=2.50
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp)
X-Archive-Number: 200304/7
X-Sequence-Number: 1733

sgmltools-1.0.9, specifically sgml2latex and sgml2html don't work here 
with the postgresql sgml files.  I've been trying to build the tutorial, 
reference manual, etc.  The Linux sgml HOWTO files seem to work just 
fine, so I don't think it is a problem with the basic sgmltools 
installation, although I don't know sgml or sgmltools very well.  Is 
this a known problem?  At this point, I'm wishing you had stuck with 
groff and tex, given the frustration level I've been sxperiencing. 
 Still, thanks for all the effort.