X-Original-To: pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.193]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B31EE30F96A; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 14:25:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (svr1.postgresql.org [64.117.224.193]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22228-07; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 11:25:13 -0300 (ADT) Received: from europa.janwieck.net (h00045a2e4e7c.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.131.181.55]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2DC30F97B; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 11:25:10 -0300 (ADT) Received: from Yahoo.com (ismtp.afilias.com [216.217.55.254]) (authenticated) by europa.janwieck.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5OEO3c22699; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 10:24:03 -0400 Message-ID: <3EF85E98.9010500@Yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 10:22:16 -0400 From: Jan Wieck Organization: Unorganized User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arjen van der Meijden Cc: nolan@celery.tssi.com, "'Advocacy PostgreSQL'" , "'PostgreSQL-general'" Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Documentation quality WAS: interesting References: <001a01c33a58$08276b40$3ac15e91@acm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, RCVD_FAKE_HELO_DOTCOM_2, REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA, X_ACCEPT_LANG X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200306/242 X-Sequence-Number: 1454 Arjen van der Meijden wrote: >> Jan Wieck wrote: >> If you work on Unix systems remotely on a regular base, you >> should have >> a Unix system as a workstation too. That way you can use ssh(1) to >> forward your X11 connections through a secure channel. >> >> A "second" PC can be implemented as a memory+disk upgrade >> together with >> a VMware license. > > There also ssh clients which support X11 forwarding on a windows machine > and since there are X11 servers for windows... > You don't necessarily need a unix workstation. Apart from that, a > (tight)vnc server might be less bandwidth consuming. There are all kinds of stuff that works. VPN's, VNC's, you name it. I just have the best experience with having a Unix workstation when administering/working on remote Unix systems. Plus, banning your workstation(s) into virtual machines has another, not so obvious advantage. A backup of the workstation not only get's reduce to copying the files that make up the virtual disk ... you can restore it onto different hardware without confusing the device manager or going through config hassles. Ever restored a Windows backup onto a replacement notebook? Don't risk that "fun". Right now I have 1 Linux and 2 Win2K "systems" running inside of VMware on my notebook. With FreeBSD and Minix standing by. They are a happy little virtual network. But I think we're going a bit off topic here ... Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #