X-Original-To: pgsql-general-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.193]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D84C30F985 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 15:48:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (svr1.postgresql.org [64.117.224.193]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 34095-06 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 12:48:29 -0300 (ADT) Received: from www.pspl.co.in (www.pspl.co.in [202.54.11.65]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D82630F95E for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 12:48:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from root@localhost) by www.pspl.co.in (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h5OFmQk29685 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 21:18:26 +0530 Received: from daithan (daithan.intranet.pspl.co.in [192.168.7.161]) by www.pspl.co.in (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h5OFmPH29680 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 21:18:26 +0530 From: "Shridhar Daithankar" To: "'PostgreSQL-general'" Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 21:17:41 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [OT] Windows v/s Unix [was Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Documentation quality WAS: interesting] Reply-To: shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in Message-ID: <3EF8BFF5.25472.32A94C@localhost> References: <3EF8523C.4000709@Yahoo.com> In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body X-Archive-Number: 200306/1580 X-Sequence-Number: 44508 On 24 Jun 2003 at 9:08, scott.marlowe wrote: > I gave up on windows as a workable solution for interfacing to Unix > systems long ago. It's like driving a mini-cooper around a track full of > formula-1 cars. I agree. But I would like to point out two thinks why unix lovers hate windows. 1. Pathetic text processing tools. 2. Pathetic kernel. 3. Pathetic GUI. Last comes from KDE. So not too much relevant to really old unix guys. But I miss KATE with multisession abilities. Konqueror when I select a URL to open it automatically, no matter source of it and all kind of other goodies..multiple desktop is one of them.. For 1, cygwin could do it's best. I use mksnt as it is required by my day job. Anything is almost OK compared to windows command line. But 2. is killer. I can do a grep search in a 120MB dump in less than 3-4 min. on linux if files aren't cached and in less than 30 sec. if they are cached. Nothing on windows comes anywhere close to it even on logarithmic scale. I miss linux..:-( really bad..:-( Bye Shridhar -- "On a normal ascii line, the only safe condition to detect is a 'BREAK'- everything else having been assigned functions by Gnu EMACS."(By Tarl Neustaedter)