X-Original-To: pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.193])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6F1F5310275; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:54:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193])
	by localhost (svr1.postgresql.org [64.117.224.193]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 94053-08; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:54:42 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.ez3pl.com (66-136-75-131.ded.swbell.net [66.136.75.131])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1E04F310210; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:54:41 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from speedfc.com (djackson.espeedfulfillment.com [172.25.96.11])
	by mail.ez3pl.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id h5RFqi211156;
	Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:52:45 -0500
Message-ID: <3EFC684F.1090605@speedfc.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:52:47 -0500
From: DeJuan Jackson <djackson@speedfc.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
	Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>,
	"Advocacy (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org>,
	PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] interesting PHP/MySQL thread
References: <200306222159.h5MLxT720807@candle.pha.pa.us>
	<15339.1056334760@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20030623032251.GA27826@dcc.uchile.cl>
	<16073.1056340630@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20030623044621.GA28777@dcc.uchile.cl>
In-Reply-To: <20030623044621.GA28777@dcc.uchile.cl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="------------000704000705080605040109"
X-Archive-Number: 200306/293
X-Sequence-Number: 1505

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------000704000705080605040109
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

 From the SQLite FAQ Item (7)
*
(7) Can multiple applications or multiple instances of the same 
application access a single database file at the same time?*

Multiple processes can have the same database open at the same time. 
Multiple processes can be doing a SELECT at the same time. But only one 
process can be making changes to the database at once.



Alvaro Herrera wrote:

>Actually, I read the website right after I sent the email and I was...
>"surprised."  I am still wondering if it allows some kind of concurrent
>access.
>
>  
>


--------------000704000705080605040109
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
  <title></title>
</head>
<body>
From the SQLite FAQ Item (7)<br>
<b><br>
(7) Can multiple applications or multiple instances of the same  
application access a single database file at the same time?</b><br>
<p><a name="q7">Multiple processes can have the same database open at
the same   time.  Multiple processes can be doing a SELECT   at the
same time.  But only one process can be making changes to   the
database at once.</a></p>
<br>
<br>
Alvaro Herrera wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid20030623044621.GA28777@dcc.uchile.cl">
  <pre wrap="">Actually, I read the website right after I sent the email and I was...
"surprised."  I am still wondering if it allows some kind of concurrent
access.

  </pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>

--------------000704000705080605040109--