X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (developer.postgresql.org [64.117.224.193]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB5AB438B8 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 13:21:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (svr1.postgresql.org [64.117.224.193]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 70126-09 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 10:21:10 -0300 (ADT) Received: from www.pspl.co.in (www.pspl.co.in [202.54.11.65]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 366D4B438BD for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 10:21:09 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from root@localhost) by www.pspl.co.in (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h64DLDs03897 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 18:51:13 +0530 Received: from daithan (daithan.intranet.pspl.co.in [192.168.7.161]) by www.pspl.co.in (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h64DLCQ03891 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 18:51:13 +0530 From: "Shridhar Daithankar" To: Postgresql Performance Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2003 18:50:19 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL Reply-To: shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in Message-ID: <3F05CC6B.23813.161542@localhost> In-reply-to: <1057324269.32874.35.camel@jester> References: <200307041823.40101.shridhar_daithankar@nospam.persistent.co.in> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.12a) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body X-Archive-Number: 200307/56 X-Sequence-Number: 2349 On 4 Jul 2003 at 9:11, Rod Taylor wrote: > > Unless you provide these, it's difficult to help.. > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2003-05/msg00299.php Well, even in that thread there wasn't enough information I asked for in other mail. It was bit too vague to be a comfortable DB tuning problem. Am I reading the thread wrong? Please correct me. Bye Shridhar -- Ahead warp factor one, Mr. Sulu.