X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54B7D1B516; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:06:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [64.117.224.130]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08485-03; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 07:05:45 -0300 (ADT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.188]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F08C5D1B4F3; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 07:05:42 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [212.227.126.161] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 19wIu0-0003Yp-00; Mon, 08 Sep 2003 12:05:44 +0200 Received: from [80.129.141.206] (helo=pse-consulting.de) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 19wItu-0005NJ-00; Mon, 08 Sep 2003 12:05:38 +0200 Message-ID: <3F5C5477.4090707@pse-consulting.de> Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 12:05:43 +0200 From: Andreas Pflug User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Darko Prenosil Cc: Bruce Momjian , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org, PostgreSQL Win32 port list Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Windows CHM format for the documents References: <200309080300.h88305423501@candle.pha.pa.us> <200309080926.43872.darko.prenosil@finteh.hr> In-Reply-To: <200309080926.43872.darko.prenosil@finteh.hr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200309/33 X-Sequence-Number: 1989 Darko Prenosil wrote: >On Monday 08 September 2003 05:00, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > >>ilkka@visiomode.com wrote: >> >> >>>Hello, >>> >>>As Postgres is now going native to Windows platform, many people will >>>probably want a CHM format (HTML Help) of the manuals. >>> >>> >>> >Bruce, we have done that before a month for pgAdmin for entire postgresql >documentation. Please contact Andreas - no need to do it again ! > > > What we *not* have done so far is extracting keywords from the doc. It's not easy for us pgadminers keeping up-to-date with the doc, but it's doable (we need to notice added/deleted pages to update the contents), but maintaining the keywords is probably beyond our capabilities. Regards, Andreas