X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84411D1B465; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:47:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27406-03; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 11:47:31 -0400 (AST) Received: from ms-smtp-02-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-02-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.136]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D696D1C951; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 11:47:27 -0400 (AST) Received: from corvette.mascari.com (uar225045.columbus.rr.com [204.210.225.45]) by ms-smtp-02-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id hB1FlFDh021830; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:47:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from mascari.com (ferrari.mascari.com [192.168.2.1]) by corvette.mascari.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hB1Fk1303280; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:46:01 -0500 Message-ID: <3FCB6239.1010109@mascari.com> Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 10:46:01 -0500 From: Mike Mascari User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Momjian Cc: Tom Lane , Oliver Elphick , Neil Conway , PostgreSQL hackers list , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] initdb should create a warning message [was Re: [ADMIN] References: <200312011534.hB1FYEe15467@candle.pha.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <200312011534.hB1FYEe15467@candle.pha.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200312/8 X-Sequence-Number: 2168 Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > >>Oliver Elphick writes: >> >>>On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 23:18, Neil Conway wrote: >>> >>>>I do agree that we could stand to document the purpose of pg_clog >>>>and pg_xlog more clearly. However, this information belongs in the >>>>standard documentation, not scattered throughout $PGDATA. >> >>>Then it needs to be stated very prominently. But the place to put a >>>sign saying "Dangerous cliff edge" is beside the path that leads along >>>it. >> >>How about changing the names of those directories? > > > I thought about that, but what would we call them? We could change xlog > to wal, I guess. That might actually be clearer. xlog could become > xstatus or xactstatus or just xact. > active_xdata active_cdata Mike Mascari mascarm@mascari.com