Subject: Re: incoorect restore_command
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
 Philipp Gramzow <phil@philphonic.de>
Cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
References: <161397938841.15451.13129264141285167267@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
 <YDXo2tIJmkW6mhkm@paquier.xyz>
 <478b5b00-5ab3-a1b5-65f4-19b4409c720b@philphonic.de>
 <YDYFuW+6Y72vRk9Q@paquier.xyz>
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Message-ID: <3c8a08bb-3eaa-cdc6-08f9-3298342722c2@oss.nttdata.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 20:15:59 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <YDYFuW+6Y72vRk9Q@paquier.xyz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 2021/02/24 16:52, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 07:24:17AM +0100, Philipp Gramzow wrote:
>> I agree, using a proper extension would be more straightforward. I'm sure
>> that's the reason why someone changed our archive_command.
> 
> Okay, let's do so in the docs then.  Others may have comments to
> offer, so I'll first wait a bit before applying my suggestion from
> upthread.

I agree with this change.

But I have one question; why do those commands use different
archive directories? Isn't it better to use the same one?

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION