Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB6E79888D for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:29:12 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82010-07 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:28:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com (mail-gy0-f174.google.com [209.85.160.174]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37B4799A3A for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:29:01 -0300 (ADT) Received: by gyg8 with SMTP id 8so262328gyg.19 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:28:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=Lh/XBkFNc5rLvI09CFw/X7kd2VmeO7HvPS3Iye0yDGs=; b=pcUt6mvExRvo1oD9WsdxNVHVa3TfkRsijhVrtSsDg8x4Gt7OU5ixiXz0O3t8f9HeAB 8eiRlKhkWDBfq2ruhSIfXSjzpXScYnADfJhOYIbmn1KthUD3fVB60nwa0F9trOq/WENK rTbUtDAsnUZNzxpkLXa0JT5p1Laxf9EQU7MC4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=VGy5JNKY7vu9HOwx0zwmz9V/1lU4+wC5VsDvJryV0euexbyFYgs/XKymnD3E1jB/S2 csfIE2HrhOoSsknZH5b4HJ7fLKBI6xomli86Me/SGpljAPMKDQK109nPzTQCwTDyUy7x k1nkFoT5F7mzWAIvU8R+ffh6dHe1FXTyJheqk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.30.29 with SMTP id d29mr300751and.247.1268792938558; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:28:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:28:58 +0900 Message-ID: <3f0b79eb1003161928n6e6a75cp28623c35cad2bb2f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: The type of ssl_renegotiation_limit From: Fujii Masao To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=001485f80e8a6575c10481f5e092 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.053 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=AWL=0.546, BAYES_00=-2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201003/8 X-Sequence-Number: 5373 --001485f80e8a6575c10481f5e092 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/runtime-config-connection.html#RUNTIME-CONFIG-CONNECTION-SECURITY > ssl_renegotiation_limit (int) It's described that the type of ssl_renegotiation_limit is "int". Though it's not apparent error, we should use "integer" rather than "int". In the description of other parameters, "integer" has been used. Here is the patch. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center --001485f80e8a6575c10481f5e092 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="ssl_renegotiation_limit_type_v1.patch" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="ssl_renegotiation_limit_type_v1.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_g6vii3k40 KioqIGEvZG9jL3NyYy9zZ21sL2NvbmZpZy5zZ21sCi0tLSBiL2RvYy9zcmMvc2dtbC9jb25maWcu c2dtbAoqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioKKioqIDYwNyw2MTMgKioqKiBTRVQgRU5BQkxFX1NFUVNDQU4g VE8gT0ZGOwogICAgICAgPC92YXJsaXN0ZW50cnk+CiAgCiAgICAgICA8dmFybGlzdGVudHJ5IGlk PSJndWMtc3NsLXJlbmVnb3RpYXRpb24tbGltaXQiIHhyZWZsYWJlbD0ic3NsX3JlbmVnb3RpYXRp b25fbGltaXQiPgohICAgICAgIDx0ZXJtPjx2YXJuYW1lPnNzbF9yZW5lZ290aWF0aW9uX2xpbWl0 PC92YXJuYW1lPiAoPHR5cGU+aW50PC90eXBlPik8L3Rlcm0+CiAgICAgICAgPGluZGV4dGVybT4K ICAgICAgICAgPHByaW1hcnk+PHZhcm5hbWU+c3NsX3JlbmVnb3RpYXRpb25fbGltaXQ8Lz4gY29u ZmlndXJhdGlvbiBwYXJhbWV0ZXI8L3ByaW1hcnk+CiAgICAgICAgPC9pbmRleHRlcm0+Ci0tLSA2 MDcsNjEzIC0tLS0KICAgICAgIDwvdmFybGlzdGVudHJ5PgogIAogICAgICAgPHZhcmxpc3RlbnRy eSBpZD0iZ3VjLXNzbC1yZW5lZ290aWF0aW9uLWxpbWl0IiB4cmVmbGFiZWw9InNzbF9yZW5lZ290 aWF0aW9uX2xpbWl0Ij4KISAgICAgICA8dGVybT48dmFybmFtZT5zc2xfcmVuZWdvdGlhdGlvbl9s aW1pdDwvdmFybmFtZT4gKDx0eXBlPmludGVnZXI8L3R5cGU+KTwvdGVybT4KICAgICAgICA8aW5k ZXh0ZXJtPgogICAgICAgICA8cHJpbWFyeT48dmFybmFtZT5zc2xfcmVuZWdvdGlhdGlvbl9saW1p dDwvPiBjb25maWd1cmF0aW9uIHBhcmFtZXRlcjwvcHJpbWFyeT4KICAgICAgICA8L2luZGV4dGVy bT4K --001485f80e8a6575c10481f5e092--