Received: from smtp2.a2000.nl (spartacus.a2000.nl [62.108.1.20]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA82628; Tue, 12 Oct 1999 19:36:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gravity@dds.nl) Received: from node10065.a2000.nl ([24.132.0.101] helo=node10066) by smtp2.a2000.nl with smtp (Exim 2.02 #4) id 11bBSv-0005yT-00; Wed, 13 Oct 1999 01:36:22 +0200 Message-Id: <4.1.19991013014049.00a81350@mail.a2000.nl> X-Sender: gravity@pop.dds.nl X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 01:41:27 +0200 To: Bruce Momjian , Oliver Elphick From: gravity Subject: Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Cc: PostgreSQL-development , PostgreSQL-documentation In-Reply-To: <199910122056.QAA09210@candle.pha.pa.us> References: <199910122049.VAA04297@linda.lfix.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 16:56 12-10-99 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Installation is the administrator's job, and not of interest to `normal' > users, so it should not be placed in the book as if every user had to do > it. Done. Certainly better to get that at the end. That chapter is going to be a mess to look at. I agree on this particular item BUT... wouldn't it be nice if the book would be a 'hard' book? there already are lots of database tutorials, introductions to sql etc. focus on db developers, go into (maybe not that deep) how and why postgres is/was developed the way it is/was. 'hard' books are a 'good thing' (tm) and it would be too bad if this would become another entry-level booklet. OTOH an entry-level book is probably required to get as big a user-base as possible.