Received: from diligence.com ([216.166.138.131]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f03GiF798037 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2001 11:44:15 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tim@diligence.com) Received: (qmail 8390 invoked by uid 535); 3 Jan 2001 16:49:16 -0000 Received: from tim@diligence.com by pdc.diligence.com with qmail-scanner-0.94 (. Clean. Processed in 0.051419 secs); 03/01/2001 09:49:16 Received: from unknown (HELO ddi-kl3f5lagj0p) (192.168.0.54) by pdc.diligence.com with SMTP; 3 Jan 2001 16:49:15 -0000 Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20010103094238.00a53b78@mail.diligence.com> X-Sender: tuckun@mail.diligence.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 09:44:40 -0700 To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org From: Tim Uckun Subject: Re: Re: RE: Re: MySQL and PostgreSQL speed compare In-Reply-To: <003601c07583$f7c0ff00$7889ffcc@comstock.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Archive-Number: 200101/73 X-Sequence-Number: 2239 > >What a horrible chicken and egg scenario... you can't help with providing >documentation until you have some deal of experience with something, but if >you ask for better documentation to get that experience, you are told to >write some. I understand the frustration, but at the same time, please >understand the frustration of those trying to learn. Personally I find the >documentation is more than adequate, but could always be improved. Hopefully >I will learn enough at some point to be able to say that I'm ready to >contribute... until then I'll be here feeding off the scraps of knowledge >that are dribbled here and there... You are right of course but what happens once you have learned it? For me I never seem seem to be able to do the right thing that being "now that I have solved the problem I should write it down and submit it to the maintainers of the document". :wq Tim Uckun Due Diligence Inc. http://www.diligence.com/ Americas Background Investigation Expert. If your company isn't doing background checks, maybe you haven't considered the risks of a bad hire.