Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1913F2E0069 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:53:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81446-05 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:53:26 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50CAC2E0032 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:53:32 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m5GDrSth000402; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:53:28 -0400 (EDT) To: Peter Eisentraut cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: xmlagg documentation In-reply-to: <200806161149.39595.peter_e@gmx.net> References: <200806161149.39595.peter_e@gmx.net> Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut message dated "Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:49:39 +0200" Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:53:28 -0400 Message-ID: <401.1213624408@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200806/10 X-Sequence-Number: 4927 Peter Eisentraut writes: > I just noticed that the xmlagg function is not documented. (Here is a random > piece of documentation for those who are not familiar with what it does: > http://docs.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/fn_XMLAGG.html) I'm wondering whether we > should put this with the aggregate functions or the XML functions, or both, > in some way. Any ideas? It doesn't seem to fit with the other aggregate functions, so I think I'd vote for documenting it with the XML functions. regards, tom lane