X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E095D1E18A
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Sat, 21 Feb 2004 08:13:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 97160-08
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Sat, 21 Feb 2004 04:13:16 -0400 (AST)
Received: from frodo.hserus.net (frodo.hserus.net [204.74.68.40])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967C5D1E188
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 04:13:16 -0400 (AST)
Received: from concord.pspl.co.in ([202.54.11.72]:64453 helo=frodo.hserus.net)
	by frodo.hserus.net with asmtp
	(Cipher TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.30 #1)
	id 1AuSGC-0004nJ-Tb by authid <shridhar> with plain
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 13:43:17 +0530
Message-ID: <40371316.1040709@frodo.hserus.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 13:43:10 +0530
From: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar@frodo.hserus.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
	rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: jade X openjade
References: <20040220151609.41601.qmail@web13125.mail.yahoo.com>
	<40363AAE.4010004@commandprompt.com>
In-Reply-To: <40363AAE.4010004@commandprompt.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200402/20
X-Sequence-Number: 2275

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Halley Pacheco de Oliveira wrote:
> 
>> In my Athon 1.7 512 MB RAM computer with Debian it
>> takes 2m6s to generate de PostgreSQL 7.4.1 HTML
>> documentation using JADE and 4m7s using OPENJADE
>> (almost 2X). So why use OPENJADE ?
> 
> 
> I would have to double check, but I think OPENJADE offers better backend 
> support.
> 
> Personally I think the real question should be, Why *JADE*? We should be
> doing whatever it takes to move to XML/XSLT.
> 
> Using Apache xerces I can transform a 1000 page document in less than a 
> minute.

I have used xercess-C++ in my current project and I can tell you one thing. It's 
object model is broken.

It is a fine API in general but the way it's object model is broken, makes me 
hate it.. really..

  Given a better choice I wouldn't use it. But I haven't used any other XML 
toolkits either. My XML experience is pretty limited..

  Shridhar