Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l8ZdG-0007g2-1K for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 02:17:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l8ZdE-0004xe-LP for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 02:17:00 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l8ZdE-0004xX-Fr for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 02:17:00 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l8ZdC-0004Gk-7Q for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 02:16:59 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1172GuSN406061; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 21:16:57 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Tatsuo Ishii cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: pg_wal_lsn_diff In-reply-to: <20210207.105701.515450239500106923.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp> References: <20210206.151125.960423226279810864.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp> <190699.1612630676@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20210207.105701.515450239500106923.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp> Comments: In-reply-to Tatsuo Ishii message dated "Sun, 07 Feb 2021 10:57:01 +0900" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <406059.1612664216.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 21:16:56 -0500 Message-ID: <406060.1612664216@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Tatsuo Ishii writes: > So do you think we should back-patch to existing stable branches? I'd just fix HEAD and v13. The earlier branches are not friendly at all to long function descriptions. regards, tom lane