X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47076D1B19F; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 10:40:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 90385-10; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 13:40:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sysop.firm.ee (sysop.firm.ee [212.107.42.137]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F0FBD1B18F; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 10:40:10 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from root@localhost) by sysop.firm.ee (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i67DeGN30582; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 16:40:16 +0300 (GMT-3) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (80-235-33-174-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.33.174]) by sysop.firm.ee (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i67De8R30555; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 16:40:08 +0300 (GMT-3) Message-ID: <40EBFE13.1030108@future.ee> Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 16:43:47 +0300 From: Kaarel User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (X11/20040615) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Momjian Cc: Peter Eisentraut , PostgreSQL-general , PostgreSQL-documentation Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Do we need more emphasis on backup? References: <200407062224.i66MOK412274@candle.pha.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <200407062224.i66MOK412274@candle.pha.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200407/12 X-Sequence-Number: 2420 >>I'm not a fan of having N "FAQs" for N topics. Just put it into the >>documentation. > > > No, I was thinking of adding an FAQ _item_ about it, not a new FAQ. > I think it would actually make a nice subchapter of the official documentation. Although not strictly PostgreSQL specific but a "best practices" section under Administration and with a reference from Introduction would be good. Kaarel