X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91474329E3B for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 05:44:39 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11773-08 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 04:44:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sue.samurai.com (sue.samurai.com [205.207.28.74]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD156329E32 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 05:44:37 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sue.samurai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD7703E73; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 00:44:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sue.samurai.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sue.samurai.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 68771-01-4; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 00:44:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [61.88.101.19]) by sue.samurai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC5D43F58; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 00:44:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <41413138.3050203@samurai.com> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:44:40 +1000 From: Neil Conway User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Macintosh/20040616) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Lane Cc: Alvaro Herrera , "Thomas F.O'Connell" , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Minor Typo in SELECT docs References: <21EDB02E-01DF-11D9-B9D0-000D93AE0944@sitening.com> <4140E7BD.5090001@samurai.com> <20040909234728.GA7082@dcc.uchile.cl> <13660.1094787700@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <13660.1094787700@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mailbox.samurai.com X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/13 X-Sequence-Number: 2532 Tom Lane wrote: > There are a lot of typos besides this one, and always have been. > Personally I'd rather spend the time proofing current docs. Also, there's been a tendency in the past to not regenerate the online docs for each point release in a stable branch (particularly for formats like PS and PDF). So that's been another reason we haven't bothered with this in the past. I tend to agree with Tom that it's not really worth the trouble to backport these kinds of fixes, as long as it's just a cosmetic typo. -Neil