Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lenS0-0000uw-4h for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 23:30:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lenRz-0007Tw-22 for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 23:30:35 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lenRy-0007To-SN for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 23:30:34 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lenRs-0006x6-8b; Thu, 06 May 2021 23:30:34 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 146NUKV84187444; Thu, 6 May 2021 19:30:20 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Alvaro Herrera cc: "Jonathan S. Katz" , "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" , "pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Link t the souce code In-reply-to: <20210506232243.GA7460@alvherre.pgsql> References: <20210506232243.GA7460@alvherre.pgsql> Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera message dated "Thu, 06 May 2021 19:22:43 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <4187442.1620343820.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 19:30:20 -0400 Message-ID: <4187443.1620343820@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Alvaro Herrera writes: > This text seems to work fine for released versions, but not very well > for development, because it says this: True. > 3. add a separate paragraph that says to obtain the source from the > other dir if it's the development one. > I kinda prefer the last one, because then we could also suggest to use a > Git repo instead of a tarball, which I suppose is the best option anyway. Yeah. There is text mentioning the git repo further down, but it's hardly prominent. We should move it up and recommend that as the best thing for dev work. regards, tom lane