X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B3044E28F; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 17:22:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 79336-08; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 17:22:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smartmx-03.inode.at (smartmx-03.inode.at [213.229.60.35]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA8F544E29A; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 17:21:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [62.99.252.218] (port=64949 helo=[192.168.0.2]) by smartmx-03.inode.at with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CiyZ8-0001qE-SI; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 18:21:55 +0100 Message-ID: <41D044B1.2020400@x-ray.at> Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 18:21:53 +0100 From: Reini Urban User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: pgsql-hackers-win32@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Does "console code page" issue apply to References: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE476453@algol.sollentuna.se> In-Reply-To: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE476453@algol.sollentuna.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200412/63 X-Sequence-Number: 2759 Magnus Hagander schrieb: >>At the bottom of >>http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/install-win32.html >>there is some info about having to set the correct console >>code page for psql. Does this apply to the MinGW and/or >>Cygwin builds, or is it only relevant for Visual C++ and >>Borland C++ builds? If the former, it's in the wrong place. >>I am not sure what the right place is though. > > > It definitly applies to the MinGW build. Not sure about Cygwin. Cygwin ditto (see the note at the end), but previous cygwin builds (up to 7.4.5 if I remember correctly) had only limited codepage support. If unsupported by your cygwin build it will complain on initdb and/or psql otherwise. -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/