X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB8F38BA30C
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:58:36 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 17724-07
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:58:32 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.coretech.co.nz (coretech.co.nz [202.36.204.41])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C7968BA0D7
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:58:30 +0000 (GMT)
Received: (qmail 5861 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2005 20:58:25 -0000
Received: from 218-101-13-115.paradise.net.nz (HELO ?192.168.1.11?)
	(218.101.13.115) by 0 with SMTP; 15 Feb 2005 20:58:25 -0000
Message-ID: <42126376.7070403@coretech.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:02:46 +1300
From: Mark Kirkwood <markir@coretech.co.nz>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041016
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
	Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: How the planner uses statistics
References: <200502150447.j1F4lhw23059@candle.pha.pa.us>
	<4211A5F0.4080203@coretech.co.nz>
	<200502150810.08816.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <200502150810.08816.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.011 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200502/47
X-Sequence-Number: 2880

Robert Treat wrote:
> 
> 
> I thought it was more correct to use < rather than &lt; inside of 
> <programlisting> tags? 
> 

I am unsure about this myself (I copied the usage from perform.sgml).

Mark