public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
To: Jeff Davis <[email protected]>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
Cc: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Treat <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove replicaiton FAQ item.
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:40:50 -0700
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1114365882.3567.21.camel@jeff>
References: <[email protected]>
	<1114365882.3567.21.camel@jeff>

Jeff Davis wrote:
> Should the text include a mention of synchronous vs. asynchronous? Or
> does master-master imply synchronous?

It shouldn't. It is possible to have synchronous replication without it
being master<->master.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


> 
> Regards,
> 	Jeff Davis
> 
> On Sun, 2005-04-24 at 08:01 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
>>Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Robert Treat wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Sunday 14 November 2004 16:33, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Log Message:
>>>>>-----------
>>>>>Remove replicaiton FAQ item.
>>>>>
>>>>>Modified Files:
>>>>>--------------
>>>>>    pgsql/doc:
>>>>>        FAQ (r1.269 -> r1.270)
>>>>>
>>>>>(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/FAQ.diff?r1=1.269&r2=
>>>>>1.270) pgsql/doc/src/FAQ:
>>>>>        FAQ.html (r1.227 -> r1.228)
>>>>>
>>>>>(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/src/FAQ/FAQ.html.diff
>>>>>?r1=1.227&r2=1.228)
>>>>
>>>>While the answer may have been a little dated, this still seems to be an FAQ.
>>>>Was there a discussion on removing this?  If so I'll go read that, but ISTM
>>>>this question should remain.
>>>
>>>agreed, this definitly does fall under a "Very FAQ" kinda thing ... 
>>>pointers to the various methods that are currently in use, at a minimum, 
>>>would be good ...
>>
>>Yep, big mistake my removing the replication FAQ item. I have re-added a
>>new one:
>>
>>	4.21) What replication solutions are available?
>>	
>>	Though "replication" is a single term, there are two major replication
>>	technologies. Multi-master replication allows read/write queries to be
>>	sent to multiple replicated computers. Using this capability has a
>>	serious performance impact. Pgcluster is the most popular such solution
>>	available for PostgreSQL. Master-slave replication allows a single
>>	master to receive read/write queries, with slaves able to accept only
>>	read/SELECT queries. The most popular master-slave PostgreSQL
>>	replication solution is Slony. There are also commercial and
>>	hardware-based replication solutions available.
>>
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend




view thread (15+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove replicaiton FAQ item.
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox