X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C516052834 for ; Sun, 22 May 2005 22:30:50 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12699-05 for ; Mon, 23 May 2005 01:30:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailbox.samurai.com (mailbox.samurai.com [205.207.28.82]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB9BB52896 for ; Sun, 22 May 2005 22:30:37 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (mailbox.samurai.com [205.207.28.82]) by mailbox.samurai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1029318CD85; Sun, 22 May 2005 21:31:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailbox.samurai.com ([205.207.28.82]) by localhost (mailbox.samurai.com [205.207.28.82]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 52230-02-9; Sun, 22 May 2005 21:31:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [61.88.101.19] (unknown [61.88.101.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailbox.samurai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B666318CDBA; Sun, 22 May 2005 21:31:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42913268.7030305@samurai.com> Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 11:31:20 +1000 From: Neil Conway User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neil Conway Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: punctuation in function tables References: <428D3ED0.3090002@samurai.com> In-Reply-To: <428D3ED0.3090002@samurai.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mailbox.samurai.com X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.021 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200505/36 X-Sequence-Number: 3001 Neil Conway wrote: > The function definition tables in func.sgml use punctuation > inconsistently: some descriptions are terminated by a period, some are > not. Is there any opinion on which variant is "correct"? I ended up not including a period in single-sentence function descriptions, but using both separating and terminating periods in multiple-sentence descriptions. Applied to HEAD. -Neil