Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([192.204.191.242]) by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fBHFA5m69046; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 10:10:06 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fBHFA9i04310; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 10:10:09 -0500 (EST) To: Justin Clift cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Need to include the length of trigger names In-reply-to: <3C1D9DE1.289D1D32@postgresql.org> References: <3C1D9DE1.289D1D32@postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to Justin Clift message dated "Mon, 17 Dec 2001 18:25:21 +1100" Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 10:10:09 -0500 Message-ID: <4307.1008601809@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Archive-Number: 200112/6 X-Sequence-Number: 1187 Justin Clift writes: > I was just looking at the Developer Docs for the "CREATE CONSTRAINT > TRIGGER" command in the SQL Commands reference section. Noticed it > doesn't include a mention of the maximum length of the trigger "name" > field (31 characters). I reckon this should be mentioned, It's the same as every other name. Do you want us to repeat the whole of http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-syntax.html#SQL-SYNTAX-IDENTIFIERS in every CREATE command's reference page? I don't think that'd be an improvement. regards, tom lane