X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 532A0D89C3 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 17:05:22 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13732-02 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 20:05:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.metronet.co.uk (mail.metronet.co.uk [213.162.97.75]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADED9D85D7 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 17:05:19 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mainbox.archonet.com (84-51-143-99.archon037.adsl.metronet.co.uk [84.51.143.99]) by smtp.metronet.co.uk (MetroNet Mail) with ESMTP id 01BBE40E009 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 21:05:04 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mainbox.archonet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F6215F1D for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 21:05:04 +0100 (BST) Received: from mainbox.archonet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mainbox [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21761-05 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 21:05:01 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.1.17] (client17.office.archonet.com [192.168.1.17]) by mainbox.archonet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D8115ED9 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 21:05:01 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4320996C.9060500@archonet.com> Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 21:05:00 +0100 From: Richard Huxton User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Contents page - usability suggestion Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.057 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.007, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05] X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200509/12 X-Sequence-Number: 3198 I do try and be good and look up manual references where I think they're useful to people on the mailing lists, and one small thing makes this harder than I think it needs to be. If you go to the main contents page on any of the recent manuals (.../index.html) and hit "End" to go to the bottom of the page you don't see the Index or Appendices, you get the bottom-half of "List of xxx". Is it difficult to put these sections on separate pages? Is it a bad idea? I sympathise if people don't like tinkering with the doc generation stuff - I remember trying to get some Jade setup working on RH8 and I still wake up screaming... -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd