X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FA16D87B5 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 17:35:20 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20633-01 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 20:35:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.metronet.co.uk (mail.metronet.co.uk [213.162.97.75]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 983F4D6E3B for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 17:35:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mainbox.archonet.com (84-51-143-99.archon037.adsl.metronet.co.uk [84.51.143.99]) by smtp.metronet.co.uk (MetroNet Mail) with ESMTP id 1C8E440B241; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 21:35:03 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mainbox.archonet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899C415F1D; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 21:34:09 +0100 (BST) Received: from mainbox.archonet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mainbox [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22430-03; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 21:34:07 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.1.17] (client17.office.archonet.com [192.168.1.17]) by mainbox.archonet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BF4915ED9; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 21:34:07 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4320A03E.4070309@archonet.com> Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 21:34:06 +0100 From: Richard Huxton User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Eisentraut Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Contents page - usability suggestion References: <4320996C.9060500@archonet.com> <200509082220.08385.peter_e@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <200509082220.08385.peter_e@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.057 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.007, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05] X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200509/15 X-Sequence-Number: 3201 Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Richard Huxton wrote: > >>Is it difficult to put these sections on separate pages? > > Yes. I feared as much. >>Is it a bad idea? > > > No. > > We could simply get rid of them (rather than trying to move them > somewhere else), which I would personally support. If that's the decision, I'd be happy to put in the effort to make sure the index covers everything useful out of the various lists. I'd need to know soon or in a couple of weeks though. Off on honeymoon next week and my new wife is understanding, but not *that* understanding... -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd