X-Original-To: pgsql-general-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E589DC83B for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 19:52:24 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48282-04 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 19:52:26 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from joeconway.com (wsip-68-15-9-201.sd.sd.cox.net [68.15.9.201]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0F99DC824 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 19:52:21 -0400 (AST) Received: from [206.190.70.130] (account jconway HELO [172.16.1.115]) by joeconway.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP-TLS id 3376007; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 15:55:55 -0800 Message-ID: <43BB0E38.1050602@joeconway.com> Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 15:52:24 -0800 From: Joe Conway User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050923 Fedora/1.7.12-1.5.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Lane CC: pgsqlrpms-hackers@pgfoundry.org, Tino Wildenhain , pgsql-general@postgresql.org, Andre Truter Subject: Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation References: <1134823993.14378.37.camel@fullyautomatix.home.trusoft.co.za> <43A4109C.6060304@enelserver.com> <1134827063.14378.41.camel@fullyautomatix.home.trusoft.co.za> <43A41AFE.9030007@enelserver.com> <1134828849.14378.45.camel@fullyautomatix.home.trusoft.co.za> <1134831184.14378.51.camel@fullyautomatix.home.trusoft.co.za> <1134835756.4975.183.camel@Andrea.peacock.de> <8867.1134844268@sss.pgh.pa.us> <43A4726E.6050700@joeconway.com> <9980.1134852474@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <9980.1134852474@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.196 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.065, SUBJECT_NOVOWEL=0.131] X-Spam-Score: 0.196 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/119 X-Sequence-Number: 89064 Tom Lane wrote: > Joe Conway writes: > >>I'm happy to lump all the docs back into the README if that's what you >>want, but I split it up in the first place because it was getting very long. > > No, I'm not really proposing that we force all contrib modules to have > only a README. I'm just annoyed by the lack of consistency (dblink/doc > versus tsearch2/docs, and some of the other modules seem to have some > doc files just loose in their top directory). > > It's not only the downstream packagers that have missed these: the > Makefiles don't install them either. > > It'd be a good idea to settle on what we want the installed file layout > to be --- do we need to create subdirectories under {prefix}/doc to > forestall name conflicts? > While I'm messing with dblink, did you want me to do anything WRT this? Thanks, Joe