X-Original-To: pgsql-patches-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BFD49DC8AF; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 23:51:43 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 83318-06; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 23:51:47 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from linda-5.paradise.net.nz (bm-5a.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 694889DC802; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 23:51:40 -0400 (AST) Received: from smtp-1.paradise.net.nz (tclsnelb1-src-1.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.172]) by linda-5.paradise.net.nz (Paradise.net.nz) with ESMTP id <0ISN000U1JTH9W@linda-5.paradise.net.nz>; Fri, 06 Jan 2006 16:46:29 +1300 (NZDT) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (218-101-28-233.dsl.clear.net.nz [218.101.28.233]) by smtp-1.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D095AF04A49; Fri, 06 Jan 2006 16:46:28 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 16:46:26 +1300 From: Mark Kirkwood Subject: Re: Summary table trigger example race condition In-reply-to: <20060106030415.GL43311@pervasive.com> To: "Jim C. Nasby" Cc: pgsql-patches@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Message-id: <43BDE812.5000103@paradise.net.nz> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20051106) References: <20060105213645.GY43311@pervasive.com> <43BDC132.90007@paradise.net.nz> <20060106030415.GL43311@pervasive.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.301 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.301] X-Spam-Score: 0.301 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/52 X-Sequence-Number: 18388 Jim C. Nasby wrote: > On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 02:00:34PM +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > >>However, I think the actual change is not quite right - after running > > > DOH! It would be good if doc/src had a better mechanism for handling > code; one that would allow for writing the code natively (so you don't > have to worry about translating < into < and > into >) and for > unit testing the different pieces of code. > Yes it would - I usually build the SGML -> HTML, then cut the code out of a browser session to test - the pain is waiting for the docs to build. > Anyway, updated patch attached. > This one is good! Cheers Mark