X-Original-To: pgsql-patches-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B59F9FB37E for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 22:17:32 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 67375-10 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 22:17:27 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from joeconway.com (joeconway.com [68.15.9.201]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 047BC9FB36A for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 22:17:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.4.40] (account jconway [192.168.4.40] verified) by joeconway.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP-TLS id 4137962; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 18:17:26 -0700 Message-ID: <44CFFD26.8040807@joeconway.com> Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 18:17:26 -0700 From: Joe Conway User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060501 Fedora/1.7.13-1.1.fc5 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Lane CC: pgsql-patches@postgreSQL.org Subject: Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: References: <44B69778.5050104@dunslane.net> <50461.84.63.113.55.1152832991.squirrel@pezone.net> <44B7ADFC.90205@dunslane.net> <44BC0432.3040509@joeconway.com> <44BC661F.80609@joeconway.com> <44BCD06C.3060409@calorieking.com> <44BCF1D4.3010807@dunslane.net> <5842.1153246741@sss.pgh.pa.us> <44BD8854.9060506@calorieking.com> <15212.1153279954@sss.pgh.pa.us> <44BDB2F5.7080003@joeconway.com> <44BEA710.6060700@joeconway.com> <23198.1153367887@sss.pgh.pa.us> <44BF0382.2010501@joeconway.com> <23454.1153370214@sss.pgh.pa.us> <44BF122F.1080200@joeconway.com> <23927.1153373971@sss.pgh.pa.us> <44C00E1E.1000405@joeconway.com> <14047.1153442773@sss.pgh.pa.us> <44C4451A.4010906@joeconway.com> <11495.1153757531@sss.pgh.pa.us> <44C4F625.2050304@joeconway.com> <12029.1153760969@sss.pgh.pa.us> <44CC0A66.6070903@joeconway.com> <16429.1154463351@sss.pgh.pa.us> <44CFBC78.2020508@joeconway.com> <27359.1154474195@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <27359.1154474195@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.018 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200608/39 X-Sequence-Number: 20555 Tom Lane wrote: > Here's what I've got so far. I think there's probably more gold to be > mined in terms of reducing runtime memory consumption (I don't like the > list_free_deep bit, we should use a context), but functionally it seems > complete. I'm off to dinner again, it's in your court to look over some > more if you want. OK, I'll continue to look at it this week. > (PS: if you want to apply, go ahead, don't forget catversion bump.) > Sure, I'll commit shortly. Thanks, Joe