X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381589FB266 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 14:48:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03503-08 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 17:48:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from joeconway.com (joeconway.com [68.15.9.201]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1DF9FB213 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 14:48:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [206.190.70.130] (account jconway HELO [172.16.1.115]) by joeconway.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP-TLS id 4140924; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 10:48:37 -0700 Message-ID: <44D236F4.2010001@joeconway.com> Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 10:48:36 -0700 From: Joe Conway User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060501 Fedora/1.7.13-1.1.fc5 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Eisentraut CC: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org, Tom Lane , Gavin Sherry Subject: Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: References: <44B69778.5050104@dunslane.net> <18685.1154617090@sss.pgh.pa.us> <200608031911.48010.peter_e@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <200608031911.48010.peter_e@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.816 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL, SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Level: *** X-Archive-Number: 200608/6 X-Sequence-Number: 3624 Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > >>Should we give VALUES its own reference page? That doesn't quite >>seem helpful either. cc'ing to pgsql-docs for ideas. > > This is probably the sort of thing that should be explained part II "The > SQL Language". In particular, section 7.2 is about table expressions, > which this is either a case of or related to. > > A few examples on the command references pages to show how it can be > useful are probably OK, but the big picture shoulbd be developed in > chapter 7 or so. > I'll need some time (perhaps a few weeks because I'm just starting to do business travel again), but I'll take responsibility to write something up if you'd like. Joe