X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F352A9FB2BB
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:47:17 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 26492-07 for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:47:14 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from bugaboo.mu (ns1.bugaboo.mu [213.133.111.57])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D5769FB2B5
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:47:14 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from [192.168.0.242] (berlin.programmfabrik.de
	[::ffff:213.221.101.147]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 markus@bluegap.ch)
	by bugaboo.mu with esmtp; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:47:11 +0200
	id 00E0A306.44E9B95F.00003939
Message-ID: <44E9B95D.1030209@bluegap.ch>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:47:09 +0200
From: Markus Schiltknecht <markus@bluegap.ch>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
CC: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>,
  Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>
Subject: Replication Documentation
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.607 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO, SARE_SPEC_REPLICA
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200608/40
X-Sequence-Number: 3658

Hi,

has there been a consensus about where a replication document should go 
and what it should cover?

Regards

Markus