Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA459FB21B for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 13:57:54 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 94637-03 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 13:57:45 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from community1.commandprompt.com (host-130.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E5E9FA4F4 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 13:57:45 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.27.150] ([12.38.10.44]) (authenticated bits=0) by community1.commandprompt.com (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id k93GvHCI003237 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 3 Oct 2006 09:57:23 -0700 Message-ID: <4522966D.2080408@dunslane.net> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 12:57:17 -0400 From: Andrew Dunstan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060804 Fedora/1.0.4-0.5.1.fc5 SeaMonkey/1.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jim C. Nasby" CC: Tom Lane , Markus Schaber , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] timestamptz alias References: <45218F90.1050303@logix-tt.com> <794403F6-6CB5-4726-806C-5EF76D64C7E3@themactionfaction.com> <34B58049-42F3-468D-AA2A-AE79DC8FB244@decibel.org> <45222B63.2070608@logix-tt.com> <26117.1159889582@sss.pgh.pa.us> <45228C3A.2090704@dunslane.net> <20061003164715.GW81937@nasby.net> In-Reply-To: <20061003164715.GW81937@nasby.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.142 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200610/3 X-Sequence-Number: 3724 Jim C. Nasby wrote: > On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 12:13:46PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > >>> >>> Perhaps it'd be better to provide a small table of recognized type >>> aliases, rather than inserting equivalent notes into three or four places. >>> >>> >>> >> you mean like the table here? >> http://momjian.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/datatype.html >> > > An issue I've seen with the docs is that for chapters that have a lot of > sections (such as 8), the section list at the start of each chapter > fills the screen, so it's easy to miss the fact that there's more info > beneath the list (which is wy presumably most folks never knew that > table existed). > > I think the ideal way to handle this would be to put the table of > contents in a side-bar and flow the text around it. But that could be a > real bear to do in docbook/sgml, so perhaps it would be better to just > force the TOC for each chapter onto it's own page (and ensure the > overview/introduction text shows up in the TOC). > I would like a frame driven version of the docs (c.f. doxygen, javadoc, etc.). The we would not need contents links at the top of each chapter like this. Navigating the HTML docs is less than pleasant. Unfortunately, I don't have enough time or docbook-fu to be able to do this. cheers andrew