Message-ID: <4523BF93.1020006@dunslane.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 10:05:07 -0400
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
	rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060804 Fedora/1.0.4-0.5.1.fc5 SeaMonkey/1.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Magnus Hagander <mha@sollentuna.net>
CC: "Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	Markus Schaber <schabi@logix-tt.com>, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] timestamptz alias
References: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0FC21@algol.sollentuna.se>
In-Reply-To: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0FC21@algol.sollentuna.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> I would like a frame driven version of the docs (c.f. 
>> doxygen, javadoc, etc.). The we would not need contents links 
>> at the top of each chapter like this. Navigating the HTML 
>> docs is less than pleasant. 
>> Unfortunately, I don't have enough time or docbook-fu to be 
>> able to do this.
>>     
>
> Yuck. Frames. Ickk. All the issues with bookmarking and searching and
> things like that.
>
> Anyway. If done, make sure the current version doesn't go away, but make
> the frames version just an option instead.
>
>
>   

Then use a tiled mechanism instead if you want to avoid frames. Or if 
you want to be get more advanced some sort of Ajax solution. But we need 
some sort of nav bar that you can drill down on. Navigation now is just 
horrible, IMNSHO.

cheers

andrew