Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1A09FA65C; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 21:13:33 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13392-07; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 00:13:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-130.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A559FA5D8; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 21:13:22 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.95] (or-67-76-146-141.sta.embarqhsd.net [67.76.146.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9P0CvSi023298 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:13:06 -0700 Message-ID: <453EAC32.7070207@commandprompt.com> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:13:38 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060918) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jim C. Nasby" CC: Simon Riggs , Markus Schiltknecht , josh@agliodbs.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Bruce Momjian , PostgreSQL-documentation Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition References: <200610240339.k9O3dYh19144@momjian.us> <200610241137.47486.josh@agliodbs.com> <453E681A.3000004@bluegap.ch> <453E6AB9.4000200@commandprompt.com> <1161727538.3861.320.camel@silverbirch.site> <453E900E.4010603@commandprompt.com> <1161728414.3861.338.camel@silverbirch.site> <453E949F.90004@commandprompt.com> <20061024235814.GY26892@nasby.net> In-Reply-To: <20061024235814.GY26892@nasby.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (lists.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:13:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.855 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO, SARE_SPEC_REPLICA X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200610/60 X-Sequence-Number: 3781 Jim C. Nasby wrote: > On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 03:33:03PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> Simon Riggs wrote: >>> On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 15:13 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >>> >>>> If it were me, I would say that the replication option has to be >>>> specific to PostgreSQL (e.g; cjdbc or synchronous jakarta pooling >>>> doesn't go in). >>> ...and how do you define PostgreSQL exactly? >> I replication product or software defined to work with only PostgreSQL? > > AFAIK Continuent's product fails that test... To my knowledge, p/cluster only works with PostgreSQL but I could be wrong. > > I don't see any reason to exclude things that work with databases other > than PostgreSQL, though I agree that replication that's actually in the > application space (ie: it ties you to TomCat or some other platform) > probably doesn't belong. I was just trying to have a defined criteria of some sort. We could fill up pages and pages of possible replication solutions :) Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate