Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BBFF9FB3B0; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 11:16:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 39697-10; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 11:16:18 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from mail.logix-tt.com (mail.logix-tt.com [212.211.145.186]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A2469FB3A5; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 11:16:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: from kingfisher.intern.logix-tt.com (84-72-188-217.dclient.hispeed.ch [84.72.188.217]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.logix-tt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB774656B6; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:18:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kingfisher.intern.logix-tt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672D418148BB6; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:16:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <453F71AE.5070106@logix-tt.com> Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:16:14 +0200 From: Markus Schaber Organization: Logical Tracking and Tracing International AG, Switzerland User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060927) MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition References: <200610250420.k9P4KXm08965@momjian.us> <0B3BCB88-2FD4-4616-BB5C-3FEB03F3C416@blighty.com> <453F098E.9090906@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <453F098E.9090906@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigA4CDD3966BCED2DC331F22D4" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.661 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO, SARE_SPEC_REPLICA X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200610/79 X-Sequence-Number: 3800 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigA4CDD3966BCED2DC331F22D4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Cesar, Cesar Suga wrote: > If people (who read the documentation) professionally work with > PostgreSQL, they may already have been briefed by those commercial > offerings in some way. >=20 > I think only the source and its tightly coupled (read: can compile alon= g > with, free as PostgreSQL) components should be packaged into the tarbal= l. >=20 > However, I find Bruce's unofficial wiki idea a good one for comparisons= =2E My suggestion is that the docs should mention only the pure existence of important third-party packages and projects in those places where it talks about the deficits that are supposedly fixed by those. E. G. "There are some third-party packages and projects that aim to provide multi-master replication, you can search for more information at http://[unofficial wiki page url] or your favourite search engine. This way, the docs stay neutral, but point the user to possible solutions of his problem. HTH, Markus --=20 Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org --------------enigA4CDD3966BCED2DC331F22D4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFP3GuyHQIGEs7eeARAyEnAKDpW/jzfdiU9v5ak1kVrsnPun/ZZQCg9kcG HCAcyM1mXTh/b/XAMiEIzII= =SeuR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigA4CDD3966BCED2DC331F22D4--