Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78859FB3A0; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:34:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 84306-06; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:34:20 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-130.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890109FB2C9; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:34:19 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.95] (or-67-76-146-141.sta.embarqhsd.net [67.76.146.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9PFYJBE008528 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 25 Oct 2006 08:34:20 -0700 Message-ID: <453F8427.50205@commandprompt.com> Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 08:35:03 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060918) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Lane CC: Magnus Hagander , PostgreSQL-documentation , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition References: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA35839@algol.sollentuna.se> <1645.1161788311@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <1645.1161788311@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (lists.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Wed, 25 Oct 2006 08:34:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.585 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO, SARE_SPEC_REPLICA X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200610/87 X-Sequence-Number: 3808 Tom Lane wrote: > "Magnus Hagander" writes: >> I think this is a good reason not to list *any* of the products by name >> in the documentation, but instead refer to a page on say techdocs that >> can be more easily updated. > > I agree with that. If we have statements about other projects in our > docs, we will have a problem with not being able to update those > statements in a timely fashion when the other projects change. This being said, I would say that the replication documentation needs to be on Techdocs or some place similar and that we should have a link in the PostgreSQL docs that points to the techdocs article and possibly: http://www.postgresql.org/download/ . Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to > choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not > match > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate